Vaccination Programs: Client or Family Incentive Rewards

CDC

An Evidence-Based Practice

Description

Client or family incentive rewards are used to motivate people to get recommended vaccinations. Rewards may be given to clients or families in exchange for keeping an appointment, receiving a vaccination, returning for a vaccination series, or producing documentation of vaccination status. Rewards may or may not be monetary, and they are typically small (e.g., food vouchers, gift cards, lottery prizes, baby products).

Results / Accomplishments

Seven studies were included in the systematic review.
-Overall vaccination rates increased by a median of 8 percentage points.
-Incentive rewards used alone led to similar changes in vaccination rates (8.5 and 9.0 percentage points; 2 studies).

About this Promising Practice

Primary Contact
The Community Guide
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS V25-5
Atlanta, GA 30329
(404) 498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/
Topics
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
For more details
https://www.thecommunityguide.org/findings/vaccina...

Related Promising Practices

  1. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Universally Recommended Vaccinations: Client or Family Incentive Rewards
  2. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Universally Recommended Vaccinations: Immunization Information Systems
  3. Immunization Case Management Intervention
  4. Increasing Age-Appropriate Immunization Rates for Children in Butler County and Surrounding Area
  5. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Interventions to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccinations among Healthcare Workers
  6. CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Interventions to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccinations among Non-Healthcare Workers

More

Related Content for: Vaccination Programs: Client or Family Incentive Rewards

An Evidence-Based Practice meets the following HCI criteria:

  1. The program description includes at a minimum: the sponsoring organization, program goals, program implementation steps, and outcomes that have demonstrated program success in achieving the program goal in one or more localities.
  2. The results from an evaluation of the program include quantitative measures showing improvement in the outcome(s) of interest after the implementation of the program (i.e. increase in smoking cessation, not just the delivery of a smoking cessation program). The outcome measure(s) is/are compared at relevant time periods before and after the intervention or program implementation. Alternatively, the evaluation study compares the outcome(s) between an intervention group and an appropriate control group.
  3. The study is of peer-review quality and presents numbers in a scientific manner; measurements of precision and reliability are included (e.g. confidence intervals, standard errors), results from statistical tests show a significant difference or change in the outcome measure(s), and relevant point estimates and p-values are presented. Note: if the results from an evaluation of a program are presented in a scientific manner and the outcome measure is improved compared to the baseline measurement or the control group but the difference is not statistically significant, the practice is classified as effective and not evidence-based.